1 Comment

But I still don’t get it…

There are networks of researchers and epistemic resources all through the region…

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35685689/

Open discussion of the Information warfare aspects of Biological Weapons and similar grey zone activity

https://cove.army.gov.au/article/covetalk-information-magic-weapons-threats-and-opportunities-0

Ongoing challenges in the scale and pace of development in these biologically constrained systems…

https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/biologicals/call-for-comments/bs-2020-2394-1st-who-is-ngs-ecbs-2020-arifa-cber.pdf

Constant spin offs and M&A on the investments side of the equation to create an extra layer of fog of war in this area of biosynthetics competition

https://gl-investment.com/upload/file/2024-11/1730802334248.pdf

Wall upon wall of ludicrous fair weather assumptions propagated by the gatekeepers of safety in virology…

https://youtube.com/embed/Aw-nR6-4kQQ?start=2464

How does all this happen and still there is a sense that the current direction is not at all an extinction level risk?

https://spiritofasilomar.org

In nuclear weaponry terms the analogy is that there has been a nuclear war, we have just come out of a nuclear winter that killed millions more than those initially targeted…and now the US and many others that should know better are afraid to declare the use of nuclear weapons anywhere by anyone an abhorrent act that is the enemy of all people and living things in our planet…

Hard to believe but too true an analogy does not exist.

Why do we respond to nuclear weapon use in one way and fail to respond to information and biological warfare?

What has gone wrong?

Expand full comment