I find this draft on <<Do No Harm 3>> self refuting.
1) <<It is obvious that virologists are the best at virology.>>
No it is not obvious Simon… Virologists in COVID Origin have shown themselves, for the very reasons of Moral Hazard that you mention at the very outset of this article, to be the absolute worst at Virology…even a basic reader in general science can see this…
2) <<Over 99.9% of questions and issues in virology can be handled by insider knowledge and decision making.>>
Statistically irrelevant and demonstrates the opposite outcome…Virologists are often not very good at statistics…especially the Dark Side of the DURC questions they ask…you know, the extinction level risks that biological weapons research entails.
4) <<Nobody can do better than they. Indeed, nobody should try.>>
This is simply untrue…you are completely misinformed about the multidisciplinary nature of knowledge claims in Virology…it is not a secret language…it is quite simple and the consequences are dire for Virology gone wrong by a insular academic Virology Community for ALL of us…all academics and all of the general community. Why? Because all our cells speak the language of RNA and so especially where AI and Machine Language Info technology can be so readily and dangerously applied the dangers of DURC Virology and Biological Weapons need to be much more broadly understood.
5) <<Yet there will be occasions when virology runs into a controversy. It is precisely these moments when virologists must engage with the public and handle discussions openly without talking down or over others.>>
In anybody’s general reading of what is available in COVID Origin research the mistakes of Virologists involved;
Their visceral defensive thinking,
Their inability to collaborate across disciplines,
Their arcane hubris and constant misunderstanding of Information Technology…
Well it is all just simply human.
We know the five knowledge claims you make here are all self refuting…because we are all, like you, humans first and last.
Yes.
If current global Virology continues into another repeat of the COVID Origin disaster we could well be the last of people.
I find this draft on <<Do No Harm 3>> self refuting.
1) <<It is obvious that virologists are the best at virology.>>
No it is not obvious Simon… Virologists in COVID Origin have shown themselves, for the very reasons of Moral Hazard that you mention at the very outset of this article, to be the absolute worst at Virology…even a basic reader in general science can see this…
2) <<Over 99.9% of questions and issues in virology can be handled by insider knowledge and decision making.>>
Statistically irrelevant and demonstrates the opposite outcome…Virologists are often not very good at statistics…especially the Dark Side of the DURC questions they ask…you know, the extinction level risks that biological weapons research entails.
4) <<Nobody can do better than they. Indeed, nobody should try.>>
This is simply untrue…you are completely misinformed about the multidisciplinary nature of knowledge claims in Virology…it is not a secret language…it is quite simple and the consequences are dire for Virology gone wrong by a insular academic Virology Community for ALL of us…all academics and all of the general community. Why? Because all our cells speak the language of RNA and so especially where AI and Machine Language Info technology can be so readily and dangerously applied the dangers of DURC Virology and Biological Weapons need to be much more broadly understood.
5) <<Yet there will be occasions when virology runs into a controversy. It is precisely these moments when virologists must engage with the public and handle discussions openly without talking down or over others.>>
In anybody’s general reading of what is available in COVID Origin research the mistakes of Virologists involved;
Their visceral defensive thinking,
Their inability to collaborate across disciplines,
Their arcane hubris and constant misunderstanding of Information Technology…
Well it is all just simply human.
We know the five knowledge claims you make here are all self refuting…because we are all, like you, humans first and last.
Yes.
If current global Virology continues into another repeat of the COVID Origin disaster we could well be the last of people.
Please review this self refuting paper Simon.
You can do better.
Fail.